Ahmed v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
Cases that cite this one
30 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- DeBenebetto v. Fodera (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
- Schindler, Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network v. Schiavo (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2026)
- Myrlie Coleman, Etc. v. Safare Horn (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2025)
- Tiffany Staesche v. Estate of Elliott Joe Housley (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2025)
- Myret v. Group Lx (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
- Zarate v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
- Bethell v. Florida Department of Revenue (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
- Solomon v. New Era Meat 2 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
- Smith v. Orhama Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
- Moniz v. Reitano Enterprises, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
- State v. Gantt (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
- Chaiken v. Suchman (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
- Haddad v. Cura (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
- Katowitz v. Katowitz (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
- Brake v. Murphy (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
- De Clements v. De Clements (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
- Dirube v. Capital Bank (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
- Commercial Union Assurance Co. of Canada v. Wynn (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
- Brancaccio v. Jackal Corp. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
- Knupp v. Knupp (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
- Smith v. Van Horn (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
- Sanfer Sports Cars, Inc. v. Barroso Auto Sales, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
- Holmes v. Holmes (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
- McNair v. Pavlakos/McNair Development Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
- Karten v. Karten (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Nuzhat AHMED, Appellant,
v.
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO., Subrogee for Diane Nickerson and Mark Nickerson, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nuzhat Ahmed, in pro per.
Max A. Goldfarb, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
An appellant has the burden to present a record that will overcome the presumption of the correctness of the trial court's findings. Dade County Bd. of Pub. Instruction v. Foster, 307 So.2d 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Where there is no record of the testimony of witnesses or of evidentiary rulings, and where a statement of the record has not been prepared pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(a)(3) or (b)(3), a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed. See Thomas v. Thomas, 498 So.2d 668 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Damkohler v. Damkohler, 336 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.