Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1987

Maler ex rel. Maler v. Geraldi

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 10, 1987 · No. 85-2865 · Baskin, Hubbart, Jorgenson

502 So. 2d 973; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 478; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6715 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Vargas, M.D. v. Gutierrez (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Lion Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Suarez (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Gold, Vann & White, PA v. DeBERRY EX REL. DeBERRY (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Maler ex rel. Maler v. Barad (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Prior to trial, the court entered an order limiting witnesses, stating:

The parties are limited to one expert per discipline.... If there are separate board certifications for ... two areas of expertise then one expert will be allowed in each.

We reject appellants’ contention that the trial court applied the order in a discriminatory fashion and improperly excluded one of their expert witnesses. A review of the record discloses that the court merely implemented its order. See Ritter v. Jimenez, 343 So.2d 659 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Stager v. Florida East Coast Ry., 163 So.2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964), cert. discharged, 174 So.2d 540 (Fla.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 878, 86 S.Ct. 162, 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965). Appellants’ remaining points lack merit.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.