Simon v. Bartel

Florida District Courts of Appeal February 24, 1987

Simon v. Bartel, 502 So. 2d 1011 (1987)

12 Fla. L. Weekly 612; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6928

Jorgenson, Nesbitt, Pearson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s judgment for the defendant notwithstanding the jury’s verdict for the plaintiff correctly recognized the fundamental principle that there is no cognizable cause of action for a mere wrong without damage. See McIntyre v. McCloud, 334 So.2d 171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name: Harold E. SIMON v. Stanley Jay BARTEL, individually, Bartel & Shuford, P.A., a Florida professional association, and Bartel, Shuford & Dubitsky, P.A., a Florida professional association
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published