Rashid v. State Bank & Trust Co. of Golden Meadow
Rashid v. State Bank & Trust Co. of Golden Meadow
502 So. 2d 1013; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 612; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6957
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Rashid v. State Bank & Trust Co. of Golden Meadow
Opinion of the Court
It is undisputed upon this record that appellant, Abdul Rashid, did not receive any notice of the bank’s motion for default as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(b). The failure to give such notice requires summary reversal. See J.A.R., Inc. v. Universal Am. Realty Corp., 485 So.2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), and cases cited therein.
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.