Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1987

London v. State

London v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 25, 1987 · Anstead, Glickstein, Herbert, Klein
502 So. 2d 1015; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 635; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6927 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

London v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but reverse the sentencing order with directions that the trial court impose a sentence no more than one cell higher than the sentencing guidelines call for because of his probation violation, see Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), unless the trial court determines that there are clear and convincing reasons for deviating further from the guidelines.

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and KLEIN, HERBERT M., Associate Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.