London v. State
London v. State
502 So. 2d 1015; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 635; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6927
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
London v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s conviction but reverse the sentencing order with directions that the trial court impose a sentence no more than one cell higher than the sentencing guidelines call for because of his probation violation, see Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), unless the trial court determines that there are clear and convincing reasons for deviating further from the guidelines.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.