The question presented to the court is the effectiveness of an after-acquired property clause in a mortgage in bringing within the foreclosed property certain adjoining property owned by the mortgagor but not described in the mortgage.

In this case, appellant, a judgment creditor, had actual notice of the documents containing the after-acquired property clause as he was party to the foreclosure proceeding. Because appellant had actual notice, the order of the trial court in confirming title in appellee is AFFIRMED.