Schwinder v. Wilson
Schwinder v. Wilson
503 So. 2d 932; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 556; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6818
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Rose v. Gaglioti & Honkonin (Florida Circuit Courts 1991)
- Bloom v. Bloom (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appellee’s filing of a counterclaim fulfilled the contractual provision that entitled the seller to recover attorney’s fees if she were compelled to take “legal action to enforce” the contract. See Richmond v. Lumb, 339 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit. See Stabinski, Funt & De Oliveira, P.A. v. Alvarez, 490 So.2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.