Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1987

City of Miami v. Aparicio

City of Miami v. Aparicio
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 10, 1987 · Barkdull, Baskin, Hubbart
503 So. 2d 966; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 736; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12039 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

City of Miami v. Aparicio

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The final order under review, which denies a motion to vacate an arbitrator’s award entered pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Miami and a firefighters’ union, is affirmed. We reach this result because no showing was made below that the arbitrator exceeded his powers, and, accordingly, the ensuing award was not subject to being vacated, as urged, under Section 682.-13(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1985). We have not overlooked The City of Miami’s contrary arguments, but find them without merit. See John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston, 376 U.S. 543, 84 S.Ct. 909, 11 L.Ed.2d 898 (1964); United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 80 S.Ct. 1347, 4 L.Ed.2d 1409 (1960); Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. v. Gonzalez, 234 So.2d 693, 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.