Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1987

Coggins v. Clark Equipment Co.

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 12, 1987 · Cowart, Dauksch, Upchurch

503 So. 2d 982; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 750; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12055 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Miller v. Miller Electric Manufacturing Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Patino v. Cessna Aircraft Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a products liability case. The question is whether the statute of limitations (repose) bars recovery. § 95.031(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). The answer must be that it does. Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla.), reh’g den., 482 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 1985); American Lib. Ins. Co. v. West and Conyers, Architects & Engineers, 491 So.2d 573 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Small v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, 502 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Pait v. Ford Motor Company, 500 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.