Nichols v. Schwarz
Nichols v. Schwarz
504 So. 2d 503; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 849; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7356
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Nichols v. Schwarz
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s holding that a continuing writ of garnishment is not available under section 61.12(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), for collecting a judgment for arrearages of child support, but is limited in application to ensuring the collectibility of future periodic payments of alimony or child support. See, e.g., Goldstein v. Ginsberg, 399 So.2d 415 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (where husband’s duty to make periodic payments had ended, continuing writ of garnishment was not available).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.