Broom v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Broom v. State, 504 So. 2d 531 (1987)
12 Fla. L. Weekly 884; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7411
Frank, Ryder, Sanderlin

Broom v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22 (Fla. 1986) (second post-conviction motion fails to show defendant did not know or could not have known of facts supporting his claims at time of initial motion); Witt v. State, 465 So.2d 510 (Fla. 1985) (does not disclose justification for failure to raise issues in first motion); Smith v. State, 445 So.2d 323 (Fla. 1983) (cannot raise appellate issues in post-conviction motion); and, Dobbert v. State, 456 So.2d 424 (Fla. 1984) (may summarily deny successive post-conviction motion asserting additional grounds for claim of ineffective assistance of counsel).

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Anthony W. BROOM v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published