Broom v. State
Broom v. State
504 So. 2d 531; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 884; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7411
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Broom v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22 (Fla. 1986) (second post-conviction motion fails to show defendant did not know or could not have known of facts supporting his claims at time of initial motion); Witt v. State, 465 So.2d 510 (Fla. 1985) (does not disclose justification for failure to raise issues in first motion); Smith v. State, 445 So.2d 323 (Fla. 1983) (cannot raise appellate issues in post-conviction motion); and, Dobbert v. State, 456 So.2d 424 (Fla. 1984) (may summarily deny successive post-conviction motion asserting additional grounds for claim of ineffective assistance of counsel).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.