Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1987

Peterson v. State

Peterson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 7, 1987 · Hubbart, Jorgenson, Pearson
505 So. 2d 16; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 954; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7572 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Peterson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s convictions for first-degree murder and robbery with a firearm upon a holding that the claimed error that the trial court unduly restricted the defendant’s cross-examination of his accomplice was not preserved for review by an appropriate proffer of the intended testimony. See Silveira-Hemandez v. State, 495 So.2d 914 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); A. McD. v. State, 422 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); *17Ketrow v. State, 414 So.2d 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑