Cox v. State
Cox v. State
506 So. 2d 53; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1111; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7877
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cox v. State
Opinion of the Court
Finding that the trial court’s failure to exclude defendant’s post-Miranda statement used by the state to rebut defendant’s insanity defense falls within the prohibitions of Wainwright v. Greenfield, 474 U.S. 284, 106 S.Ct. 634, 88 L.Ed.2d 623 (1986), and State v. Burwick, 442 So.2d 944 (Fla.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 931, 104 S.Ct. 1719, 80 L.Ed.2d 191 (1983), we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.