Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1987

Banfield v. United States Sugar Corp.

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 22, 1987 · No. 87-0144 · Anstead, Stone, Walden

506 So. 2d 461; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1094; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7818 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Roberts v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission v. Gretz (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION

PER CURIAM.

Consistent with recent rulings by the First District Court of Appeal we grant the appellant’s request to certify the following question as an issue of great public importance:

WHETHER A CLAIMANT IN AN UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CASE MAY BE CHARGED A FEE BY THE UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION FOR THE PROVISION OF A TRANSCRIPT OF THE AGENCY HEARING.

See Harris v. Department of Corrections, 486 So.2d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

ANSTEAD, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.