Stromberg v. State
Stromberg v. State
507 So. 2d 175; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1268; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8255
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Stromberg v. State
Opinion of the Court
After a thorough review of the evidence, we conclude that the trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motions for judgment of acquittal and that the state met its burden in this circumstantial evidence case. See Fowler v. State, 492 So.2d 1344 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). The trial court imposed a legal sentence upon appellant for her crimes. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is affirmed without prejudice to appellant seeking further relief pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.