Williams v. State
Williams v. State
507 So. 2d 745; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1308; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8262
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Williams v. State
Opinion of the Court
The State concedes that appellant is entitled to credit for time served against each of two sentences ordered to be served concurrently. We agree. See Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla. 1986). With such credit, appellant is entitled to immediate release.
The order denying appellant’s motion to mitigate and reduce his sentence is reversed, with directions to correct his sentence, and to immediately release him from imprisonment under that sentence.
Order REVERSED with directions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.