Mathews v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Mathews v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB, 507 So. 2d 1196 (1987)
12 Fla. L. Weekly 1379; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8546
Ferguson, Hubbart, Jorgenson

Mathews v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Where, in an action to foreclose a mortgage, there remains a material issue of fact which cannot be settled due to a question as to the competency and authority of the movant’s affiant, see Montejo Investments, N.V. v. Green Co., 471 So.2d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), and the supporting affidavits did not disprove the affirmative defenses or establish the legal insufficiency of these defenses, O’Neal v. Brady, 476 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), it was error to enter summary judgment.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Reference

Full Case Name
Jim W. MATHEWS and William H. Mathews v. DIME SAVINGS BANK OF NEW YORK, FSB
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published