Kinchen v. State
Kinchen v. State
508 So. 2d 51; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8642
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Kinchen v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See State v. Marshall, 476 So.2d 150 (Fla. 1985); Lusk v. State, 446 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 1984); and McCray v. State, 416 So.2d 804 (Fla. 1982). As we recently did in Ciccarelli v. State, 508 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), we certify the following as a question of great public importance:
IS IT NECESSARY, IN EVALUATING AN ASSERTION OF HARMLESS ERROR IN A CRIMINAL APPEAL, THAT EACH APPELLATE JUDGE INDEPENDENTLY READ THE COMPLETE TRIAL RECORD?
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.