Kinchen v. State
Kinchen v. State
508 So. 2d 51; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1453; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8642
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Kinchen v. State (Fla. 1988)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See State v. Marshall, 476 So.2d 150 (Fla. 1985); Lusk v. State, 446 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 1984); and McCray v. State, 416 So.2d 804 (Fla. 1982). As we recently did in Ciccarelli v. State, 508 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), we certify the following as a question of great public importance:
IS IT NECESSARY, IN EVALUATING AN ASSERTION OF HARMLESS ERROR IN A CRIMINAL APPEAL, THAT EACH APPELLATE JUDGE INDEPENDENTLY READ THE COMPLETE TRIAL RECORD?
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.