Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1987

Clay v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 17, 1987 · No. 85-2931 · Campbell, Frank, Lehan

508 So. 2d 561; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1516; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8931 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Vidal v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the revocation of his probation and sentence therefor.

We affirm the revocation of probation. We find no reversible error from his contention that adequate charging documents do not appear in the record. The *562record reflects that he was charged with certain probation violations of which he was found guilty, and there was no objection to any failure to advise him of the charges.

However, there must be a remand for resentencing. While the trial court orally departed from the sentencing guidelines, no written reasons were provided, and the oral reasons were clearly insufficient under the case law.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing within the guidelines recommended sentencing range.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.