Perez v. Pelea
Perez v. Pelea
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the final judgment under review but remand with directions to the trial court to conform the provisions of the final judgment dealing with the sale of the marital domicile to this court’s pronouncement in Tinsley v. Tinsley, 490 So.2d 205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Affirmed and remanded with directions.
SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON, J., concur.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting).
Paragraph nine of the final judgment of dissolution provides for a credit to the wife to be paid by the husband.
. The final judgment provides:
9. That the parties owned, as tenants of the entirety, a certain parcel of real estate, to wit: the marital home located at 5337 S.W. 133rd Place, Miami, Dade County, Florida. The Wife shall have exclusive possession, use and occupancy of the marital home until such time as the youngest child has attained the age of eighteen, (18), married, died, joined military service, or is otherwise emancipated. During the time of her exclusive possession, occupancy, and the use of the marital home, the Wife shall bear full responsibility for the mortgage payments (P.I.T.I.), and that she shall receive a credit of one-half the mortgage payments made by her as representative of her payment of the Husband's one-half interest in the marital home. Any and all maintenance items on the marital home in excess of Five Hundred ($500.00) Dollars shall be split between the parties 50/50. Upon the youngest child attaining the age of eighteen (18), or being otherwise emancipated, the marital home will then be listed for sale; and, after the subtraction of the reasonable costs of sale and the credits due the Wife for her one-half mortgage payments on behalf of the Husband, the remaining proceeds shall be split 50% to the Wife, and 50% to the Husband.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.