We reverse the order dismissing a complaint with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action. It cannot be said that the pleadings are so inconsistent with the attached exhibits as to neutralize each other. See Harry Pepper & Assocs. v. Lasseter, 247 So.2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 252 So.2d 797 (Fla. 1971). The sufficiency of the evidence which the plaintiff is likely to produce may not be considered on a motion to dismiss. N.E. at West Palm Beach, Inc. v. Horowitz, 471 So.2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Reversed and remanded.

concurring specially.

By reversing the trial court’s order dismissing Metropolitan Dade County as a defendant in this suit, we are necessarily rejecting the County’s argument that it could transfer its responsibility to maintain the roadway in question to the City of Hialeah Gardens without even notifying the City of the transfer, much less, without first agreeing with the City on a schedule for the orderly transfer of responsibilities, as the plaintiffs correctly contend is required by Section 335.04(3), Florida Statutes (1981). If such an agreement or notice were legally unnecessary, then we would have found unavailing the plaintiffs’ allegations concerning the County’s responsibility for the allegedly defective roadway 1 and would have found, therefore, the complaint against the County properly dismissed as failing to state a cause of action.