Goldberg v. Goldberg
Goldberg v. Goldberg
Opinion of the Court
The appellee concedes and it also appears to have been the trial court’s intention that the wife be solely obligated for the mortgage payments, taxes and insurance upon the marital residence, title to which the wife was awarded as lump sum alimony pursuant to the final judgment of dissolution of marriage. See Hamori v. Hamori, 490 So.2d 147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), and Farrington v. Farrington, 390 So.2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.