Cotter v. Security Acceptance Corp.
Cotter v. Security Acceptance Corp.
514 So. 2d 404; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2460; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10629
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cotter v. Security Acceptance Corp.
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
It appears to me that the trial court erred in concluding the transaction involved herein was not usurious. Appellee’s argument in support of the propriety of including the documentary stamps as part of the sum financed and its argument that Chapter 687 is not applicable to appellee because of its licensure under Chapter 516, Florida Statutes, are both misplaced in my judgment.
Accordingly, I would reverse the judgment appealed from and remand the cause to the trial court for application of the appropriate penalties under the usury statute.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.