We affirm appellant’s conviction, but remand for resentencing. The first reason given by the trial court for departure from the guidelines — that appellant was engaged in interstate as opposed to intrastate drug trafficking — does not constitute a clear and convincing reason for departure. While the second reason given by the trial court has been found to be a valid reason for departure, we are unable to say beyond a reasonable doubt that the trial court would have departed as it did, had it known the first reason it relied upon was invalid. Therefore, we reverse for re-sentencing. See Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla. 1985).

REVERSED for resentencing.

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur that reason one does not justify a departure from the sentencing guidelines.

I disagree that reason two is a valid ground for departure. I would reverse and remand with instructions for resentencing within the guidelines.