Alachua County v. Hartman

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Alachua County v. Hartman, 516 So. 2d 302 (1987)
12 Fla. L. Weekly 2699; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11182; 1987 WL 1910
Booth, Thompson, Wigginton

Alachua County v. Hartman

Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant, Alachua County, appeals a second amended final judgment finding the present zoning category and land use designation on appellees’ property to be invalid and ordering the County to place a zoning category and land use designation on the property that is consistent with the surrounding zoning and land uses and not more restrictive or less intensive than commercial except for an approximately 4-acre wetlands area. In the alternative, the trial court ruled that the County may designate the land as an activity center as described in the County’s Comprehensive Plan Land Use 2000.

Having thoroughly examined the extensive record, which includes videotapes and numerous maps, and having read and heard the arguments of the parties, we find that competent, substantial evidence supports the trial judge’s resolution of the conflicts in the evidence and his conclusions.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
ALACHUA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida v. Evelyn HARTMAN
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published