Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1987

Albertsons, Inc. v. Howells

Albertsons, Inc. v. Howells
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 9, 1987 · Frank, Lehan, Ryder
518 So. 2d 291; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2401; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10572; 1987 WL 866 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Albertsons, Inc. v. Howells

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Albertsons, the defendant in a slip-and-fall action has petitioned this court for a writ of certiorari to quash an order compelling the disclosure to the respondent of an internally-produced “incident report” prepared on the day of the accident for the store manager in accordance with the requirements of Albertsons’ claims representatives. Albertsons maintains that the report constitutes work product prepared in anticipation of litigation. Based upon Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Nakutis, 435 So.2d 307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), pet. for rev. den., 446 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1984), we agree. Rule 1.280(b)(2) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure prescribes conditions which must be satisfied to achieve entitlement to a report of the kind sought by the respondent. The respondent did not allege circumstances overriding Albertsons right to confidentiality.

Petition granted.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.