Weitzer Moon Lake, Ltd. v. Ker Equipment Co.
Weitzer Moon Lake, Ltd. v. Ker Equipment Co.
Opinion of the Court
The orders appealed from are affirmed in all respects except that we find the trial court erred in failing to grant appellants’ motion to dismiss as to Weitzer Moon Lake, Ltd. See Deltona Corporation v. Indian Palms, Inc., 323 So.2d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).
070rehearing
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
BY ORDER OF THE COURT:
We deny the parties’ motions for rehearing, but amend this court’s order of July 1, 1987 to read as follows:
ORDERED that the motion for attorney’s fees filed by Victor K. Rones, Esq. of Marguilies & Rones, P.A., is hereby granted as to appellant Weitzer Moon Lake, Ltd. and pursuant to Rule 9.400(b), Fla.R. App.P., upon remand of this cause the amount thereof shall be assessed by the trial court upon due notice and hearing, subject to review by this court under Rule 9.400(c), Fla.R.App.P., and further
ORDERED the appellee’s November 11, 1986 motion to tax attorney fees and costs against Weitzer Moon Lake, Ltd., is hereby denied, and granted and remanded as to Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Inc.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- WEITZER MOON LAKE, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership, Weitzer Enterprises No. 4, Inc., a Florida corporation, Weitzer Communities, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Inc., a Florida corporation v. KER EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published