C.M. v. State
C.M. v. State
519 So. 2d 1098; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 385; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 483; 1988 WL 8113
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
C.M. v. State
Opinion of the Court
The state presented substantial competent evidence to establish elements of aiding and abetting an aggravated battery, including evidence that the defendant acted with the requisite intent and that his acts resulted in great bodily harm. See McKnight v. State, 492 So.2d 450 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Owens v. State, 289 So.2d 472 (Fla.2d DCA 1974). Appellant’s additional points do not demonstrate reversible error.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.