Nathan v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Nathan v. State, 520 So. 2d 317 (1988)
13 Fla. L. Weekly 539; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 674; 1988 WL 13734
Campbell, Parker, Schoonover

Nathan v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from appellant’s conviction of battery and affray, we find error only in that the trial court delegated to appellant’s probation or community control officer the determination of the amount of restitution appellant was to make. On remand, the amount of any restitution to be imposed shall be determined by the trial court. Mansell v. State, 498 So.2d 604 (Fla.2d DCA 1986); Buchanan v. State, 483 So.2d 537 (Fla.2d DCA 1986). Appellant’s convictions are otherwise affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Anthony Carl NATHAN v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published