Nathan v. State
Nathan v. State
520 So. 2d 317; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 539; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 674; 1988 WL 13734
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Nathan v. State
Opinion of the Court
In this appeal from appellant’s conviction of battery and affray, we find error only in that the trial court delegated to appellant’s probation or community control officer the determination of the amount of restitution appellant was to make. On remand, the amount of any restitution to be imposed shall be determined by the trial court. Mansell v. State, 498 So.2d 604 (Fla.2d DCA 1986); Buchanan v. State, 483 So.2d 537 (Fla.2d DCA 1986). Appellant’s convictions are otherwise affirmed.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.