Riccio v. Gold Coast Capital Corp.
Riccio v. Gold Coast Capital Corp.
521 So. 2d 308; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 619; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 863; 1988 WL 18586
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Riccio v. Gold Coast Capital Corp.
Opinion of the Court
The record supports the trial court’s determination that the parties intended the Gold Coast Capital Corporation mortgage be superior to the Riccio purchase money second mortgage. We therefore affirm the Final Judgment. See Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc., 408 So.2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see also Tippett v. Frank, 238 So.2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.