Kirk v. State
Kirk v. State
521 So. 2d 340; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 675; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 959; 1988 WL 20045
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Kirk v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant’s judgment and sentence is affirmed, however, we strike the costs imposed without benefit of notice and hearing. The state may seek reimposition of those costs after appropriate notice and hearing. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984); Dilla v. State, 508 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.