Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1988

Kleinhenz v. Kleinhenz

Kleinhenz v. Kleinhenz
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 6, 1988 · Anstead, Letts, Stone
523 So. 2d 713; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 855; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1359; 1988 WL 35644 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Kleinhenz v. Kleinhenz

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS and STONE, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

ANSTEAD, Judge,

concurring specially.

I concur in the affirmance of the trial court’s orders concerning temporary custody mainly because I find from the record evidence that the trial court was acting in an abundance of caution to protect the child from the influence of the contesting parents by placing such child with the grandparents. Importantly, the custody issue will finally be resolved only after a full-scale hearing on custody at which all sides will have an opportunity to present any evidence they desire.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.