Schwanebeck v. Calzado
Schwanebeck v. Calzado
Opinion of the Court
The attorney appellee, Glassford, who had been retained under a contingency fee contract, effected a $50,000 settlement of his clients’ personal injury action only after he had been discharged and replaced by another lawyer. The trial judge was therefore in error in awarding him a $10,000 fee based upon the occurrence of the contingency.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
. In effect, the $20,000 fee, which was 40% of the recovery, was split between Glassford and his successor.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Beverly Ann SCHWANEBECK v. Argimiro Eric CALZADO
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published