Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1988

State v. Pinder

State v. Pinder
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 10, 1988 · Baskin, Hendry, Jorgenson
524 So. 2d 501; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1117; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1864; 1988 WL 44468 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Pinder

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In response to the state’s appeal from the trial court’s ruling granting suppression of evidence and discharge, counsel for appellee filed a memorandum brief confessing error and a motion for leave to withdraw. Proceeding in the manner outlined in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 19 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), this court permitted appellee thirty days within which to file a statement of points. Appellee has not filed his brief or statement. Accordingly, we hold that the state’s appeal has merit. See United States v. Garcia, 741 F.2d 363 (11th Cir. 1984); United States v. Torres, 741 F.2d 1323 (11th Cir. 1984). Cf. State v. Suco, 521 So.2d 1100 (Fla. 1988) (owner of premises, not casual visitor, has standing to challenge search as violative of fourth amendment rights).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.