Clary v. State
Clary v. State
Opinion of the Court
Joseph Huey Clary appeals from concurrent sentences for robbery with a firearm and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We remand appellant’s sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon for conformance of the written sentence to the trial court’s oral pronouncement.
We do not reach the sentencing guidelines issue raised by appellant because we
REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.