Abco. Enterprises, Inc. v. Uro-Tile, Inc.
Abco. Enterprises, Inc. v. Uro-Tile, Inc.
524 So. 2d 739; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1195; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1998; 1988 WL 47515
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Abco. Enterprises, Inc. v. Uro-Tile, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Upon a review of the record, it is clear that the appellants were independent contractors. See, e.g., Wilson v. Sandstrom, 317 So.2d 732 (Fla. 1975), cert. denied sub nom. Alder v. Sandstrom, 423 U.S. 1053, 96 S.Ct. 782, 46 L.Ed.2d 642 (1976); Cantor v. Cochran, 184 So.2d 173 (Fla. 1966); Pearson v. Harris, 449 So.2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Therefore, Chapter 448, Florida Statutes, is not applicable. Accordingly, the award of attorney’s fees to appel-lees is reversed. The award of costs is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.