Etue v. Department of Professional Regulation
Etue v. Department of Professional Regulation
524 So. 2d 1175; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1247; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2148; 1988 WL 50673
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Etue v. Department of Professional Regulation
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the final administrative order of the State Board of Accountancy except that we find the Board acted contrary to statutory directives in imposing an additional two years probation on appellant James Etue. We remand with directions that the final order be amended and the two year probation period be deleted. The fine recommended by the hearing officer may be reinstated by the Board, in the Board’s discretion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.