Stieglitz v. City Commission

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Stieglitz v. City Commission, 525 So. 2d 438 (1988)
13 Fla. L. Weekly 864; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1310; 1988 WL 28434
Baskin, Jorgenson, Pearson

Stieglitz v. City Commission

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

The respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted on the authority of Gelinas v. City of South Miami, 522 So.2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Paul v. City of Miami Beach, 519 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Johnson v. Citizens State Bank, 518 So.2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). As we did in Gelinas and Paul, we certify the question presented:

WHEN A PARTY SEEKS APPELLATE REVIEW OF A NON-APPEALABLE ORDER, AND ASSUMING THAT THE NOTICE OF APPEAL IS TIMELY FILED IN THE LOWER TRIBUNAL, MUST THE NOTICE OF APPEAL BE FILED IN THE APPELLATE COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RENDITION OF THE ORDER IN ORDER FOR THE APPELLATE COURT TO HAVE JURISDICTION TO TREAT THE NOTICE AS A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIO-RARI?

Reference

Full Case Name
Veronica STIEGLITZ v. CITY COMMISSION, CITY of SOUTH MIAMI
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published