Murphy v. Hoenigmann
Florida District Courts of Appeal
Murphy v. Hoenigmann, 525 So. 2d 1009 (1988)
1988 WL 53050
Baskin, Nesbitt, Pearson
Murphy v. Hoenigmann
Opinion of the Court
Finding that the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial, competent evidence, we affirm the Final Judgment. See Brown v. Taylor, 500 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Brown v. Vining, 334 So.2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); In re Estate of Agardy v. Dunn, 293 So.2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); McDonough v. Rudisill, 229 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), cert. denied, 237 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1970); Carberry v. Foley, 213 So.2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 222 So.2d 750 (Fla. 1969).
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Joseph H. MURPHY, Jr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lucille K. Newkirk v. John HOENIGMANN
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published