. We recognize that an individual who suffers from a lifelong illness or injury such as that involved here is subject to the draconian proposition of being forever barred from managing her own affairs. Because we reverse on other grounds we explicitly do not reach the question whether the evidence presented thus far is sufficiently clear and convincing to impose a guardianship.

. Our remand is without prejudice to Kloster to develop further her argument concerning the guardianship statute's facial validity with respect to physical incompetence. All parties concede that Kloster is mentally competent.