Cahill v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Cahill v. State, 526 So. 2d 220 (1988)
13 Fla. L. Weekly 1397; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2502; 1988 WL 59444
Anstead, Glickstein, Gunther

Cahill v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects. However, we remand to the trial court to enter a written order of revocation that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncements: that Count 1, violation of probation for changing residence without consent of probation officer, was dismissed for lack of sufficient evidence; that Count 2, violation of condition of probation for failing to submit monthly reports, was violated in the month of May only; that Count 5, violation of condition of probation for uttering a forged instrument, was violated; and Count 6, violation of probation for grand theft, was violated.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Robert CAHILL v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published