Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1988

Cahill v. State

Cahill v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 15, 1988 · Anstead, Glickstein, Gunther
526 So. 2d 220; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1397; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2502; 1988 WL 59444 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cahill v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects. However, we remand to the trial court to enter a written order of revocation that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncements: that Count 1, violation of probation for changing residence without consent of probation officer, was dismissed for lack of sufficient evidence; that Count 2, violation of condition of probation for failing to submit monthly reports, was violated in the month of May only; that Count 5, violation of condition of probation for uttering a forged instrument, was violated; and Count 6, violation of probation for grand theft, was violated.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.