Cahill v. State
Cahill v. State
526 So. 2d 220; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1397; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2502; 1988 WL 59444
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cahill v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm in all respects. However, we remand to the trial court to enter a written order of revocation that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncements: that Count 1, violation of probation for changing residence without consent of probation officer, was dismissed for lack of sufficient evidence; that Count 2, violation of condition of probation for failing to submit monthly reports, was violated in the month of May only; that Count 5, violation of condition of probation for uttering a forged instrument, was violated; and Count 6, violation of probation for grand theft, was violated.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.