Cahill v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal
Cahill v. State, 526 So. 2d 220 (1988)
13 Fla. L. Weekly 1397; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2502; 1988 WL 59444
Anstead, Glickstein, Gunther
Cahill v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm in all respects. However, we remand to the trial court to enter a written order of revocation that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncements: that Count 1, violation of probation for changing residence without consent of probation officer, was dismissed for lack of sufficient evidence; that Count 2, violation of condition of probation for failing to submit monthly reports, was violated in the month of May only; that Count 5, violation of condition of probation for uttering a forged instrument, was violated; and Count 6, violation of probation for grand theft, was violated.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Robert CAHILL v. STATE of Florida
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published