Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1988

Sobel v. State

Sobel v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 8, 1988 · Glickstein, Hersey, Letts
527 So. 2d 855; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1359; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2358; 1988 WL 56582 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Sobel v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order, summarily denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. We reverse and remand.

The dissent in Sobel v. State, 437 So.2d 144 (Fla. 1983), spelled out originally what allegedly occurred here. In our view appellant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing upon her sworn, forty-four page motion. Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla. 1981). Upon remand, counsel shall be appointed to represent appellant in the trial court. Appellate counsel is unnecessary for the current review.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.