Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1988

Camacho v. Peoples Bank of Lakeland

Camacho v. Peoples Bank of Lakeland
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 10, 1988 · Campbell, Hall, Lehan
529 So. 2d 360; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1924; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3708; 1988 WL 82673 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Camacho v. Peoples Bank of Lakeland

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

HALL, Judge.

The appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting the appellee personal representative an extension of time to refile its objection to the claim of the appellant. We do not. agree.

It is within the broad discretion of the trial court to grant or deny an extension of time, and the exercise of that discretion will usually be upheld unless it is totally unreasonable. In re Estate of Robins, 463 So.2d 273 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Baldwin v. Lewis, 397 So.2d 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.