Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1988

Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 28, 1988 · Danahy, Frank, Ryder
531 So. 2d 422; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2243; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4369; 1988 WL 99742 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Thomas v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We remand this case to the trial court for correction of two minor errors. First, the written judgment and sentence forms must be corrected to reflect the court’s oral pronouncement to the effect appellant’s two separate fourteen-year sentences are to run concurrently. Perez v. State, 498 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Second, because the court imposed costs without notice or the opportunity to be heard, those provisions must be stricken without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984). In all other respects the judgments and sentences are affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.