Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1988

Wilson v. State

Wilson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 4, 1988 · Barfield, Joanos, Wigginton
531 So. 2d 1031 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Wilson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Appellant has requested this court to correct the sentence document for Count III, delivery of a controlled substance, in that neither the concurrent nor the consecutive box was checked. We note that pursuant to section 921.16 Florida Statutes, where, as here, the court does not direct that the sentence be served consecutively, a defendant shall serve the sentences concurrently.

JOANOS, WIGGINTON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.