Talton v. Albaugh
Talton v. Albaugh
531 So. 2d 1070; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2340; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4616; 1988 WL 107130
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Talton v. Albaugh
Opinion of the Court
We affirm. See Leicht v. Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc., 848 F.2d 130 (9th Cir. 1988).
The options agreement between the parties, under which some 82% of the transactions took place, explicitly states that arbitration cannot be compelled with respect to disputes arising under federal securities laws. The subject provision, supplied by appellants, in no way indicates dependence on the rule set forth in Wilko v. Swan, 346 U.S. 427, 74 S.Ct. 182, 98 L.Ed. 168 (1953), which some courts, including this one, consider to have been overruled in Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. McMahon, 482 U.S. 220, 107 S.Ct. 2332, 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.