Marriage of Faulk v. Faulk

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Marriage of Faulk v. Faulk, 532 So. 2d 98 (1988)
13 Fla. L. Weekly 2355; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4671; 1988 WL 107404
Ervin, Wentworth, Zehmer

Marriage of Faulk v. Faulk

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit to any issue raised on appeal or cross-appeal with the exception of the husband’s contention that the trial court erred in awarding attorney's fees to the wife. The undisputed evidence reveals that the wife received marital property and income substantially equal to the husband, and thus she is in a position to bear the cost of her attorney’s fees. See Cortina v. Cortina, 461 So.2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ERVIN, WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
In re the Marriage of James Reginold FAULK, Sr., Husband/Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. Patricia Ann FAULK, Wife/Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published