Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1988

Anderson v. State

Anderson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 25, 1988 · Barkdull, Ferguson, Hubbart
532 So. 2d 1126; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2390; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4718; 1988 WL 110877 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Anderson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order of probation revocation under review is affirmed except for the finding therein that the defendant Tracy Allen Anderson violated his probation by failing to make monthly cost of supervision payments to the state to defray his probation costs. As the state concedes, this written finding is contrary to the trial court’s oral ruling at the probation revocation hearing; *1127accordingly, this finding is stricken as a scrivener’s error. See Robinson v. State, 504 So.2d 479 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Beyond that, the defendant makes no other attack on the probation revocation order which revokes his probation on four other grounds, aside from the above-stated failure to pay costs ground. The probation revocation order under review is therefore affirmed, except as modified above.

Affirmed as modified.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.